Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Best Places to Live in the US:
How the States Rank in the Face of Climate Change

Plus: The 10 Greenest Cities
Download
| Maps and analysis for you and your family.


When the media says There's "No Valid Arguments Against ___"

Try these:

Hydrofracking
Nuclear / Indian Point
Gardasil
Vaccination
Genetically-Modified Food
AIDS | HIV

The articles and reports the mainstream media tries to silence.

Health

LISTEN LIVE!

Tell Governor Cuomo:
Don't Frack New York
SIgn up for the bus today!



PLAY IN POPUP!

Trouble? Choose from our alternate ways to listen:

   

You can also call in to hear our live stream at (832) 280-0066!

CONTACT US AT: 888-874-4888

Subscribe to Our Full Podcast Feed!

Fill out your e-mail address
to receive our weekly newsletter,
with exclusive updates,
giveaways, and event invitations!
E-mail address:
 
(We will never, ever share your info with 3rd parties.)

 NEW: Find us on Google+ !

Thursday
May272010

US Inspector General Report - Falsified Oil Rig Inspections and Other Improprieties

by Stephen Lendman

Host of Progressive Radio News Hour - Thursdays at 11 am, weekends at 1 pm

On May 24, Mary L. Kendall, Acting Interior Department Inspector General's memo to her boss, Secretary Ken Salazar, discussed an "Investigative Report," titled "Island Operating Company, et al," addressing allegations that Lake Charles, Louisiana District Office Minerals Management Service (MMS) employees (in charge of inspections and oversight) "accepted gifts from oil and gas production companies."

Occurring prior to 2007, it provides evidence that "a much-needed (MMS ethics) change is required." Ordinarily, public release would have followed a formal MMS response, 90 days after getting it. But today's events forced Kendall "to release it now," saying her greatest concern is the "environment in which these inspectors operate - particularly the ease with which they move between industry and government."

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
May262010

BP Gulf catastrophe typifies corporate behavior in America

Tuesday, May 25, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) The Gulf of Mexico oil catastrophe, now in its 35th day, has struck land, coating tourist beaches, marshes and shorelines with a greasy black filth that metaphorically represents the corporate greed that now dominates the U.S. economy. We are all awash in the dark slime of corporations gone bad, and now we're paying the price for allowing these companies to dominate our media, our government and our entire economy.

You might think government regulators could have prevented all this, but that's hardly the case. This disaster isn't merely about a government regulation failure; it's about what happens when you let corporations rule Washington.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
May252010

Experts Propose Plugging Oil Leak with BP Executives Submerging Execs Could Be 'Win-Win'

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report
<http://borowitzreport.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=49de3335c30245ecd0f
a291aa&id=b8e39e677b&e=1c90347029> ) - At a conference of oil leak experts
in Washington today, attendees proposed plugging the massive oil leak in the
Gulf of Mexico with executives of BP, the company responsible for the
catastrophic spill.

"We've tried containment domes, rubber tires, and even golf balls," said
William Cathermeyer of the National Oil Leakage Institute, a leading
consultancy in the field of oil leaks.  "Now it's time to shove some BP
executives down there and hope for the best."

Submerging the oil company executives thousands of feet below the ocean's
surface could be a "win-win" situation, Mr. Cathermeyer said.

"Best-case scenario, they plug the leak," he said.  "And at the very least,
they'll shut the fuck up."

But even as the oil leak experts proposed their unorthodox solution,
environmental expert Marilyn Sufranski warned of the possible negative
consequences of plugging the oil leak with BP executives.

"The Gulf of Mexico is slimy enough already," she said.




Tuesday
May252010

Gulf Oil Spill: Similar Disaster Could Occur in Arctic Later This Year

The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has heightened fears of a similar
disaster occurring off America's Arctic coast, where Shell is due to begin
exploratory drilling later this year.

by Alex Spillius in Washington

President Barack Obama has ordered a review of the Anglo-Dutch firms plan's
to drill off the coast of Alaska.

[The
sun rises over an oil-soaked beach on May 23 on Grand Isle, Louisiana. The
Alaska Wilderness League said in a statement that it would be almost
impossible to mount the kind of clean-up witnessed in the Gulf of Mexico,
describing the Arctic as one of the "most remote and extreme environments on
Earth". (AFP/Getty Images/File/John Moore) ]The sun rises over an oil-soaked
beach on May 23 on Grand Isle, Louisiana. The Alaska Wilderness League said
in a statement that it would be almost impossible to mount the kind of
clean-up witnessed in the Gulf of Mexico, describing the Arctic as one of
the "most remote and extreme environments on Earth". (AFP/Getty
Images/File/John Moore)

Activists have claimed that the remote nature of the proposed drilling site,
sub-zero temperatures and gale-force winds would be formidable obstacles to
any potential clean-up operation.

The Alaska Wilderness League said in a statement that it would be almost
impossible to mount the kind of clean-up witnessed in the Gulf of Mexico,
describing the Arctic as one of the "most remote and extreme environments on
Earth".

Meanwhile, in the Gulf of Mexico, there was no end in sight for the massive
clean-up operation, as BP officials said on Sunday that one of their efforts
to slow the leak was not working as effectively as it had initially.

A mile-long tube inserted into the leaking well siphoned some 57,120 gallons
of oil within the past 24 hours, a sharp drop from the 92,400 gallons of oil
a day that the device was sucking up on Friday, according to John Curry, a
BP spokesman.

However, the company has said the amount of oil siphoned was likely to vary
from day to day.

Over the weekend Mr Obama created a commission to examine what caused the
explosion on and subsequent leak from Deepwater Horizon BP rig and to "make
sure it never happens again".

He noted concerns about the "cozy relationship between oil and gas companies
and agencies that regulate them".

However, the president underlined that he remained committed to retaining
off-shore oil as part of his energy plan. "Because it represents 30 per cent
of our oil production, the Gulf of Mexico can play an important part in
security our energy future," he said.

The establishment of the commission came as oil continued to gush from the
rig, blackening more of the Louisiana's marshlands and beaches. Even at the
lowest estimates, more than six million gallons of crude have soiled Gulf
waters.

Bob Dudley, BP's managing director, said that the latest bid to stop the
leak in a ruptured pipe 5,000 feet below the surface would began on Tuesday
or Wednesday. A "top kill" operation that has never been tried before will
shoot heavy mud into the pipe then seal it with cement.

With the crisis entering its fifth week, the Obama administration has been
forced increasingly on the defensive for responding too weakly and placing
too much trust in BP.

Normally friendly voices have begun to criticize the president personally.
James Carville, a former Bill Clinton campaign manager and Louisiana native,
said the president had been "lackadaisical" and "naïve".

Chris Matthews, a popular liberal cable TV presenter, said the president was
"acting a little like a Vatican Observer".

"The president scares me," he said. "When is he actually going to do
something? He doesn't want to take ownership of it."

Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said: "There's no doubt that
we have had some problems with BP's lack of transparency: We asked that a
video feed [of the oil gush] be made public, and that took ten days. We have
sent letter recently in order to get them to post their air-and-quality
data."




Tuesday
May252010

America's Response to the Cataclysmic Gulf Oil Catastrophe Is Pathetic -- Where's the Outrage?

By Peter Daou, Huffington Post
Posted on May 24, 2010, Printed on May 25, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/story/146979/


Shame on us.

A calamity is unfolding before our eyes - the greatest oil spill in history
- and America's response is little more than a big yawn.

Bob Herbert writes
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/opinion/22herbert.html> :

The vast, sprawling coastal marshes of Louisiana, where the Mississippi
River drains into the gulf, are among the finest natural resources to be
found anywhere in the world. And they are a positively crucial resource for
America. The response of the Obama administration and the general public to
this latest outrage at the hands of a giant, politically connected
corporation has been embarrassingly tepid. ... This is the bitter reality of
the American present, a period in which big business has cemented an unholy
alliance with big government against the interests of ordinary Americans,
who, of course, are the great majority of Americans. The great majority of
Americans no longer matter. America is selling its soul for oil.

Where is the outrage? Where are the millions marching in the streets, where
is the round-the-clock roadblock coverage tracking every moment of the
crisis, every effort to plug the leak, every desperate attempt to mitigate
the damage?

Where is the White House? Where are Republicans? Where are Democrats? Where
is the left? Where is the right? Where is the
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37248587/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/>
"fierce urgency of now?"

Prominent oceanographers [are] accusing the government of failing to conduct
an adequate scientific analysis of the damage and of allowing BP to obscure
the spill's true scope. The scientists assert that the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration and other agencies have been slow to investigate
the magnitude of the spill and the damage it is causing in the deep ocean.

In the movies, pretend heroes like Bruce Willis and Will Smith save the
planet while the whole world watches with breath and belief suspended. In
real life, a global catastrophe is treated like a mere annoyance, mismanaged
by a rapacious oil company, while drill-baby-drillers double down on their
folly and the White House puts out defensive fact sheets about how they were
on it from "day one."

Is this really the best we can do?

America is capable of greatness -- but our reaction to this unprecedented
event is anything but great.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/us/23drill.html>

In some parts of the country, the sight of oil drifting toward the Louisiana
coast, oozing into the fragile marshlands and bringing large parts of the
state's economy to a halt, has prompted calls to stop offshore drilling
indefinitely, if not altogether. Here, in the middle of things, those calls
are few. Here, in fact, the unfolding disaster is not even prompting a
reconsideration of the 75th annual Louisiana Shrimp and Petroleum Festival.
"All systems are go," said Lee Delaune, the festival's director, sitting in
his cluttered office in a historic house known as Cypress Manor. "We will
honor the two industries as we always do," Mr. Delaune said. "More so
probably in grand style, because it's our diamond jubilee."

Granted, some scientists are telling us the truth, some reporters are
digging up unpleasant facts, some citizens are rising in anger, some federal
agencies are doing what they are tasked to do. People are working to fix
this. But by and large, America's collective response to this crisis is
disproportionately anemic.

Leadership is virtually non-existent. Blaming BP for being greedy and
destructive is the least we should do, not the only thing we do. We need to
turn the tide once and for all against those whose ideological rigidity is
ravaging the planet.

A month before the spill, I wrote about green-bashing
<http://www.undispatch.com/node/9631> :

Of all the wrongheaded ideas proudly trumpeted by America's right,
anti-environmentalism occupies a unique position: it is at once the most
devoid of a rational or moral foundation and the most dangerous. It is
selfish, crass, illogical, willfully blind, a denial of the undeniable
reality that humans are pillaging irreplaceable natural resources and
spewing filth into the air and water and soil at unsustainable rates.
Green-bashers stubbornly negate what is directly before them. There is no
moral imperative underlying their belief (or lack thereof). It's about
unbridled hostility at the suggestion that we must all make shared
sacrifices. It's about refusing to acknowledge that the environmental
movement has been right to sound the alarm. It's about laziness. And greed.
And irresponsibility. And colossal shortsightedness. Green-bashing exposes
the rot at the core of modern conservatism.

The Gulf disaster is a singular moment - an opportunity to bring the human
race together to save itself, to protect its only home. This should be a
rocket-boost for the environmental movement, a time to finally put to rest
the notion that environmentalists are misguided alarmists, a chance to
finally marginalize green-bashers and put an end to their fatal
obstructionism. Instead, this grand debacle will gradually fade into the
background once some political gaffe or sports game or celebrity scandal
occupies us.

Lawmakers can say that the law mandates BP take responsibility for clean-up
and costs; federal officials can list all the things they're doing to fix
the problem; President Obama can launch as many fact-finding commissions as
he sees fit. But we shouldn't be impressed that they are doing what we
elected them to do - it's their job to deal with emergencies promptly and
effectively. Far more is called for in this uniquely cataclysmic
circumstance: a level of outrage, alarm, intensity and focus worthy of the
size and scope of the spill.

We need, and must demand, boldness and resoluteness worthy of a planetary
emergency - true leadership, rallying the nation and the world to action.
Offense, not defense. We're not getting anything close to that from
Democratic leaders. And from Republicans, far less.

The administration seems miffed and mystified that it is being criticized.
After all, it can reel off dozens of swift actions taken in the aftermath of
the spill. The White House's defenders want the spotlight aimed exclusively
at BP. But this is a situation where body language and words are just as
important as actions. Scheduling an 'angry' presidential news conference
weeks after oil started gushing into the Gulf waters is exactly the wrong
thing to do. Authentic anger isn't something you turn on for the cameras and
leak to the press the previous day. Indignation and defensiveness are
precisely the wrong message
<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/05/22/obama-announces-oil-spill-c
ommission/?fbid=iVE93v9QZZS&hpt=T1> ...

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs faced a barrage of questions at his
daily briefing about why the federal government is not intervening to take
over responsibility for the cleanup from BP. "Again, we are overseeing the
response, OK?" Gibbs said just hours before the news about the commission
broke. "I don't know what you think - we're - we're working each and every
day. That's why Secretary (Steven) Chu - the Department of Energy - it
sounds technical. The Department of Energy doesn't have purview over oil,
oil drilling. That's not in their governmental sphere."

That this lame response from various quarters of the administration,
Congress, the media and the public comes on the heels of a banner year of
climate denialism is no coincidence. We are at an inflection point, one that
will likely determine the fate of our species. Green-haters have been
winning the message war, the all-important battle of public opinion. If
those of us who want to salvage and protect our earth don't rise in
righteous anger and use this moment to cement our case, then we have failed
ourselves and future generations.

America is perfectly capable of extended, intense, undivided attention.
Michael Jackson's death is a good example. But for some reason, the Gulf
disaster can be sidelined by an offensive remark from Rand Paul or a
meaningless debate over Elena Kagan's sexual orientation. And BP is taking
its cues - America's apathy is their cover
<http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/bp_is_sticking_wi
th_its_disper.html> :

BP has told the Environmental Protection Agency that it cannot find a safe,
effective and available dispersant to use instead of Corexit, and will
continue to use that chemical application to help break up the growing spill
in the Gulf of Mexico. BP was responding to an EPA directive Thursday that
gave BP 24 hours to identify a less toxic alternative to Corexit -- and 72
hours to start using it -- or provide the Coast Guard and EPA with a
"detailed description of the alternative dispersants investigated, and the
reason they believe those products did not meet the required standards."

Why has this unfolded so badly?

*        Democratic leaders have been blindsided by this spill, having just
come out in favor of offshore drilling to appease Republicans.
*        The right, for the most part, is stuck in the 19th century, consumed
by a manic hatred for anything green.
*        Oil companies are after one thing: money.
*        The press and punditry are busy chasing the story du jour.
*        Defenders of the administration are loathe to critique it, out of a
sense of loyalty.

Consequently, we're left with a halfhearted and halting, shameful response
to a profound tragedy.

This isn't Katrina II, it's worse. As the oil keeps gushing and the damage
keeps growing, we are squandering a rare chance to turn the tide against
those whose laziness and greed and ignorance is imperiling every living
thing on our wonderful and beautiful - and wounded - planet.

Words are a necessary precursor to deeds, anger is an essential ingredient
for social change. Speaking up and speaking out is the difference between
apathy and action. 30 years of conservative message dominance is a function
of the right's ability to master outrage. Now is the time for Democrats and
progressives to muster (and master) the kind of outrage worthy of this
calamity.

UPDATE: Over at The Seminal <http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/50179> ,
Rayne lists 11 steps the White House can take to deal with the spill and
asks readers for more suggestions.

Peter Daou is political consultant and former adviser to Hillary Clinton.






Monday
May242010

Can Everyday Things Cause Cancer?

By Lisa Bennett, More Magazine
Posted on May 20, 2010, Printed on May 24, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/story/146938/

There is something about the familiar that makes us assume it is safe. Rachel Carson observed this nearly 50 years ago in Silent Spring, when she exposed the dangers of toxins in the pesticides, insecticides, and fertilizers being used to grow the food we eat. There is also something about pointing to the potential danger in familiar things that can make one come across as a kook -- paranoid, fringe, alarmist. Indeed, most of us are inclined to dismiss challenges to the familiar, especially if they are things on which we believe ourselves to be dependent, such as cell phones, cosmetics and plastic food containers. Being caught up in the moment has tremendous power to trick us in this way. That is why people throughout history have done astoundingly misguided things that, from a distance, we look back on and wonder: What were they thinking?

Yet the truth is that many of the everyday things now in our homes and workplaces are filled with chemicals that were not around as recently as the 1950s. When exposed to heat or simple wear and tear, some of these chemicals have ways of getting out of the things they are in and into us. And there are now growing suspicions about a connection between our exposure to chemicals and the rise in numerous diseases and other health-related issues. As Nicholas Kristoff recently put it in The New York Times: “Concern about toxins in the environment used to be a fringe view. But alarm has moved into the mainstream.”

The latest development is from the President’s Cancer Panel, which on May 6 released a 200-page report, entitled "Environmental Cancer Risks: What We Can Do Now" (for a summary by Reuters, go here). The report said: “With nearly 80,000 chemicals on the market in the United States, many of which are used by millions of Americans in their daily lives and are un- or understudied and largely unregulated, exposure to potential environmental carcinogens is widespread.”

The result is “grievous harm,” indeed. In recent decades, an American woman’s risk of breast cancer and an American man’s risk of prostate cancer have risen significantly. Breast cancer rates among Gen X women, for example, are twice what they were for their mothers, as epidemiologist Devra Davis reports in The Secret History of the War on Cancer. Pancreatic cancer and bone marrow cancer, which used to affect only people in their 60s or older, is now occurring to people in their 30s and 40s. And the rates of several childhood cancers, including leukemia, kidney cancer, and brain cancer, have all grown.  In short, half a century ago, when Carson warned of the risks of toxins in the food we eat, one in four Americans was at risk of cancer. Today, that’s closer to one in two.  

At the same time, there has been an upswing in several developmental conditions, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. For example, once a rare occurrence, autism now affects about one in 100 children.  And while improved detection is a part of the reason, it is not the only reason, according to Dr. Catherine Rice of the CDC, who told reporters in 2009: “We know there are multiple complex genetic and environmental factors which result in multiple forms of autism, and we have much to learn about the causes.”

Medical professionals are increasingly in agreement that children are uniquely susceptible to the dangers associated with chemicals—because their bodies and brains are still developing, and they eat, drink and breathe more for their size than adults do, which means they could carry an even heavier form of what medical experts are already describing as a “quite a toxic burden.”  As the new President’s Cancer Panel report states, “[Children] are at special risk due to their smaller body mass and rapid physical development, both of which magnify their vulnerability to known or suspected carcinogens, including radiation. Numerous environmental contaminants can [even] cross the placental barrier; to a disturbing extent, babies are born 'pre-polluted.'”

A 2009 CDC study found that American adults today have an estimated 212 environmental chemicals in their body. Some of these chemicals are the kinds we can see and smell, especially driving through places like Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Birmingham, Cincinnati and Detroit, which are among the most polluted cities in America. But perhaps the most disturbing are those we cannot see, smell or taste: those that come simply in the form of products intended to provide us with conveniences, entertainment, cleanliness, and comfort -- the most ordinary of things.

Three chemicals the CDC reported to be “widespread” in us are flame retardants (used in fabrics, upholstery, foam mattresses, computers, and TVs); a plastic strengthener, known as bisphenol A, or BPA (used in baby bottles, sippy cups, juice bottles, other food and beverage containers, CDs, and DVDs); and perfluorinate chemicals (used in non-stick coatings in cookware, stain resistant carpets, and microwave popcorn bags.)  They also found evidence of pesticides, arsenic, perchlorate (used in rocket fuel), acrylamide (used in permanent press fabrics) and triclosan (used in soaps, deodorant, toothpastes, cleaning supplies, kitchen utensils, bedding, and socks.)

There is no clear consensus that these and other common chemicals can be definitively linked to the rise in breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and numerous childhood cancers, as well as autism and other disorders. Toxicity depends upon many things, including the dose to which one is exposed and each individual’s susceptibility. But, clearly, the tide of opinion is changing. Several hundred chemicals have been identified as suspect.  And we know that while we have long been told that exposure to a chemical in small doses is not harmful to humans, the rules surely must be different when we are exposed to small doses of hundreds of chemicals over a lifetime.

In the end, at least this much is clear: In the guise of abundant convenience and material comforts, we are exposing ourselves and, more so, our children to a vast chemical brew based on a grand information vacuum. Contrary to what many people assume, after all, products that contain chemicals do not have to be proven safe before being released on the market in the United States; and chemical companies don’t even have to submit toxicity data unless government officials find the chemical poses a health risk, which they largely can’t do without access to toxicity data.

Other countries have begun to take a different approach. For example, instead of waiting for unassailable proof that a chemical harms humans before banning it, the European Union has adopted the precautionary principle. This states that if a chemical is suspected of causing harm to people or the environment, the burden of proof lies -- not with regulators deprived of inside information but -- with manufacturers to prove it is safe before millions of people can be exposed to it. As some have suggested, it’s a new version of the old idea fit for our times: First, do no harm.

Lisa Bennett is the communications director for the Center for Ecoliteracy, a nonprofit dedicated to education for sustainable living. She is writing a book about parenting in the age of global warming and can be reached at LisaOBennett@gmail.com.

 



Monday
May242010

Cap and Trade: A Gigantic Scam

By Washington's Blog

Global Research, May 23, 2010

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19294

 

As I pointed out in December:

According to James Hansen - the world's leading climate scientist fighting against global warming - in a interview on Democracy Now that cap and trade not only won't reduce emissions, it may actually increase them:

The problem is that the emissions just go someplace else. That’s what happened after Kyoto, and that’s what would happen again, if—as long as fossil fuels are the cheapest energy, they will be burned someplace. You know, the Europeans thought they actually reduced their emissions after Kyoto, but what happened was the products that had been made in their countries began to be made in other countries, which were burning the cheapest form of fossil fuel, so the total emissions actuallyincreased...

See also this and this.

Environmental groups such as Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace are also against cap and trade (and see this and this), as is the head of California's cap and trade program for the EPA.

Hansen also told Goodman that (notwithstanding Paul Krugman's assertions) most economists say that cap and trade won't work:

I’ve talked with many economists, and the majority of them agree that the cap and trade with offsets is not the way to address the problem.

As I have previously pointed out:

  • The economists who invented cap-and-trade say that it won't work for global warming
  • European criminal investigators have determined that there is a tremendous amount of fraud occurring in the carbon trading market. Indeed, organized crime has largely taken over the European cap and trade market.
  • Former U.S. Undersecretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs Robert Shapiro says that the proposed cap and trade law "has no provisions to prevent insider trading by utilities and energy companies or a financial meltdown from speculators trading frantically in the permits and their derivatives."
  • Our bailout buddies over at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and the other Wall Street behemoths are buying heavily into carbon trading (see thisthisthis,thisthisthis and this). As University of Maryland professor economics professor and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission Peter Morici writes:

Obama must ensure that the banks use the trillions of dollars in federal bailout assistance to renegotiate mortgages and make new loans to worthy homebuyers and businesses. Obama must make certain that banks do not continue to squander federal largess by padding executive bonuses, acquiring other banks and pursuing new high-return, high-risk lines of businesses in merger activity, carbon trading and complex derivatives. Industry leaders like Citigroup have announced plans to move in those directions. Many of these bankers enjoyed influence in and contributed generously to the Obama campaign. Now it remains to be seen if a President Obama can stand up to these same bankers and persuade or compel them to act responsibly.

In other words, the same companies that made billions off of derivatives and other scams and are now getting bailed out on your dime are going to make billions from carbon trading.

One the largest boosters for cap and trade invented credit default swaps - which were supposed to increase financial stability, but instead were a large part of the reason that the world economy crashed last year

Jeanne Roberts provides an update at environmental website Celsius:

The E.U. carbon emissions trading fraud is huge, but perhaps nothing compared to the potential for cheating that will become available in the United States once Waxman-Markey, or some similar scheme for reducing carbon emissions, emerges from the Senate to become law.

***

As Bloomberg notes, a carbon trading market organized around derivatives (sometimes known as credit default swaps, or CDS) is “open to manipulation,” in the words of billionaire hedge fund investor George Soros.

In fact, some old-school environmentalists see the whole carbon trading scheme as not a way to curb climate change, but merely a way to make the rich even richer at the expense of the rest of us. As Larry Lohmann, the founding member of the Durban Group for Climate Justice, says, “Dishonesty is rife throughout the carbon offset market.”

In January, investigators from Belgium said that in some E.U. countries, 90 percent of the market volume in carbon trading was based on criminal activities.



Monday
May242010

Global Crisis: The Time of Testing Is Here

By Richard C. Cook

Global Research, May 22, 2010

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19273

 While skeptics mockingly point out that the “end of the world” has been prophesized over and over again for centuries with nothing happening—the latest being Y2K, they say, and another likely bust coming up when the calendar hits 2012—it’s obvious that mankind faces an increasingly unsustainable future.

The world’s economic, technological, agricultural, and political systems are breaking down. While the causes are debated, it’s certain that the human assault on the natural world has wiped out vast numbers of species and polluted the land, the air, and the oceans. After the past 100 years of history, with two world wars and low-grade but vicious warfare going on almost continuously somewhere in the world since World War II ended, it seems impossible for human beings to live together in a state of harmony either among ourselves or with the planet we call home.

Are we at “the end of the age?”

In social life, the overriding characteristic of our era is the increasing division in the world between haves and have-nots, masters and slaves, controllers and controlled, rich and poor. The power of the wealthiest class of people has never been so great. The weapons of mass destruction they–and the armed forces who work for them–monopolize have the force to destroy the earth many times over.

Teachings of peace, tolerance, charity, which have always received lip service, lack efficacy. Such teachings increasingly count for nothing. Organized religion, done in by its own transgressions and lack of transformative potency, rarely even attempts to make a stand for justice or persuade nations to forego war.

The people at the very top of the heap have been those Western financial magnates, especially from the Anglo-American-Zionist empire and the European Union, who control banking, industry, investment, and credit. The world is run by an international financial elite and their subordinates in government, corporations, academia, the military, and the media. This elite have plunged billions of people and the nations they inhabit into astronomical levels of debt. They are the controllers who live off the fat of the land, skimming the cream of science and industry through usury on money they create out of thin air through financial monopolies granted or at least tolerated by the politicians whose strings they pull. No longer leaders of the popular will, the political classes of all Western nations, most particularly the United States, are servants of private financial and corporate interests.

The controllers realize how tenuous stability has become. So they seem to have embarked on a worldwide consolidation of power, using every tool available from the fields of electronic surveillance and social engineering to enhance their dominance. Nations not entirely under their control, such as Russia and China, are tagged as adversaries and surrounded with military bases. The controllers are suspected of having vowed among themselves that the existing world population of almost seven billion human beings cannot be allowed to continue. A large portion of the human herd must be culled, an action that now appears to be underway with the world’s resources increasingly passing into the hands of centralized financial interests.

But this will not necessarily fend off the even larger disaster that threatens mankind. For the controllers themselves also inhabit the earth. No man is an island. What threatens the least of God’s creatures threatens them as well.

The perspective of the controllers is therefore incomplete. What it leaves out are human freedom, aspiration, and spirituality. It also leaves out nature and nature’s laws. Further, it leaves out God, whatever we mean by that word, still knowing that there is “something” or “someone” who is the ultimate creative force. Perhaps these most materialistic elements of humanity are not quite as sharp as they think they are in trying to erect a fortress against the universe in order to save themselves.

For instance, they have not yet found a way to negate the law of cause and effect: “As ye sow, so shall ye reap.” An example is the BP oil catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico caused by negligence in addressing pre-existent problems in a manner reminiscent of the space shuttle Challenger disaster of 1986. Both events exposed the pride of man as mere dust. Disasters may also be lying in wait due to genetically-modified seeds laced with pesticides where crop failures or the appearance of super-resistant insects could lead to mass starvation.

The controllers desire to rule from their glitzy world capitals of glass and steel while maintaining “safe” suburban, rural, or island palaces and retreats. Many, though not all, are the physical or spiritual descendents of those who rejected God by rejecting Jesus Christ 2,000 years ago, though according to some traditions their genealogy may be much older. Though the Christian churches offer many confusing and contradictory interpretations, it was Jesus Christ who prophesized the end of the age and sought to prepare mankind for it. Christianity is first and foremost an eschatological religion, especially as it hearkens back to such Old Testament prophets as Isaiah.

But in recognizing that the size of the human population is an overriding issue, shouldn’t we ask why are so many people alive on earth at this time? Where have they come from? Is it simply a result of improved sanitation, more productive farming methods, or the reduction in infant mortality? Or is there a hidden cause? The planet today resembles a train station at rush hour. Perhaps for the sake of discussion we should look at it from a somewhat mystical perspective. Should we consider, for instance, that the huge increase in the world’s population has taken place because all the human souls from the last several thousand years of history have been allowed to incarnate in order to give them one final chance to develop spiritually and move on to higher planes of being?

It could also be that a side-effect of the large earth population has been the emergence of the critical mass of information that has led in turn to exponential growth in science, technology, and economic productivity, the latest phase being the cybernetic revolution. Has man, in his vanity, attributed this apparent progress to his own stellar qualities, while failing to guard against the temptations deriving therefrom and their potential for binding him to the material plane? Perhaps man has surrendered his soul through a Faustian bargain based ultimately on the illusion which science promotes of someday attaining physical, as opposed to spiritual, immortality. In his delusion, man has viewed the earth as his true home rather than a place to reside temporarily for learning, experience, and eventual transcendence. The great parable of modern man may have been Goethe’s Faust, published in 1808 and prefiguring the spiritual crisis of the modern age.

We should note well the fact that due to social and political upheaval, combined with modern methods of communication, every person alive has been exposed to teachings of spiritual evolution, not just from Christianity, but from other religions such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism, as well as spiritual teachings such as yoga that cross religious lines. All have taught that our true home is in the spiritual realms, not in the rounds of earthly life and death. (Judaism is excluded from this list, as there are so many different Jewish sects, including so-called “secular Judaism,” that it is difficult to isolate a specific teaching on spiritual development.)

Why else have we seen in the past century so many enlightened teachings coming from all parts of the world, existing side-by-side with organized political, financial, and military horror? Doesn’t it seem that each and every soul on the planet is being tested? As indicated above, perhaps each of us is being given one last opportunity to attain enlightenment before the curtain comes down and the theater is closed for the season. This may be one way to look at the concept of the “end times.”

So what are we waiting for? Shouldn’t we be coming together to work in every way possible for the furtherance of truth and the enhancement of being? Shouldn’t we be creating centers of light to prepare ourselves and each other whatever lies ahead? Indeed, some are. But are we doing enough?

Time appears to be running out, with dire changes having already begun. Who knows, maybe there is only a year or two remaining of relative freedom of movement before the controllers reveal their deep affinity with the dark side by setting up what seems to be their planned world dictatorship, world government, and world currency. They have learned how to manufacture crises and disasters, such as 9/11, as a means of seizing more power. The signs that they are springing the trap will be the increased bureaucratization of all aspects of life, wartime measures like rationing and transportation checkpoints, centralization of financial institutions, control of populations through un- and under-employment, elimination of freedom of speech on the internet, and continued growth of computerized systems containing personal identifying information. As has happened before, the majority of people will likely be so sick of the rising tide of chaos the controllers have helped engineer they will willingly trade their autonomy for the shackles of totalitarian order.

To accomplish their ends, won’t the controllers also try to stamp out the last vestiges of spirituality on earth? They have already attacked many spiritual teachers and movements since the epochal change of consciousness that emerged in the 1960s. The rebellious flower children were seduced by dangerous drugs developed and distributed by covert operatives. Other examples were the engineered reaction within the Catholic Church against Vatican II and the liberation theology movement, as well as the takeover of Protestant Christianity by Zionists among the Evangelicals. A friend points out that militant Zionists also took over and subverted the Reform movement within Judaism. And it has been the Western intelligence agencies, going back over a century, who helped create radical Islam in order to declare the Middle East a base of “terrorism” so that war against the Islamic world could be rationalized and their oil resources seized.

The controllers engineered these and other reactions because the only way they can rule is to eliminate the naturally-occurring hope of free individuals for a higher level of consciousness and a more humane world. Other methods include mind control through TV programming and the continued dumbing-down of the population through an educational system now based entirely on learning by rote and government-mandated standardized tests. As 1984 and Brave New World showed to previous generations and the cynical manipulation of political reporting by Murdoch-owned Fox News indicates today, the masses are easy to control. Fox News is doing it by co-opting the Tea Party movement and goading it into a phony rebellion that ignores the real issues of elite control. All these elements hide the fact that it is the controllers who are the real terrorists in the world today.

Now embedded microchips, along with automated administration of pharmaceuticals to individuals by nanotechnology, appear to be on the way. The first step toward the microchip in the U.S. could be the national ID card as proposed by U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) in connection with immigration reform. According to published reports, the card Schumer proposes would contain a person’s social security number, along with biometric data such as retinal scans and fingerprints. Such a card could easily be expanded to include credit and criminal history, DNA sequences, and medical history, all linked to a central database.

As cited in Politico, Sen. Schumer has stated his belief that “Hashem”–Hebrew for “the Name”–has appointed him the guardian of the state of Israel within the U.S. Senate. He has also spoken of himself as a potential presidential candidate. As events move forward, particularly with politicians like Schumer on the rise, many seemingly innocent people will be faced with difficult decisions of whether, and how far, to “get along by going along.”

But whoever accepts the chip, it is said, will wear the “mark of the beast”—by choice, because the conscience within will have cried out against it. The post-World War II Nuremburg trials established that no one is innocent because they were simply following orders, a ruling that should apply to victims as well as perpetrators. Of course “the chip” can take many forms, making self-deception and rationalization easy.

Yet God is not mocked. Every human being on the planet has a God-given conscience which allows us to distinguish between right and wrong–if we listen to our conscience. Some say we have an individual guardian angel who is the guide to our conscience. How many of us seek the counsel of this guide?

And is the time also at hand that the “earth changes” which have been prophesied will manifest on an increasingly vast scale? How will the planet cleanse itself? It has been prophesied, for instance, by Edgar Cayce and others that as part of this cleansing, New York and Connecticut will one day be under water. Such predictions seem less preposterous today than 60 years ago, now that scientists are discussing the increased potential for extreme climatic events through alterations in the earth’s magnetic field or in connection with earth temperature changes.

Without a doubt, the time must also come when the United States will no longer exist in anything resembling its present form. How can a nation as heedless, violent, prurient, complacent, and materialistic as this one possibly continue on its present course when the earth is purged of falsehood? How can objective justice tolerate a nation that sadistically tortures prisoners of war and routinely kills civilians with unmanned drone strikes halfway around the world?

G.I. Gurdjieff was a spiritual master from the Caucasus who studied in the most remote parts of Asia and spent his mature years teaching pupils in France. In the 1920s he visited the U.S., spending most of his time in New York. He reportedly said, “America will rot before it ripens.” The causes, he intimated, would be America’s obsession with “dollar business,” its diet of processed foods, and its dissipated lifestyle. 

Gurdjieff was right. Regarding “dollar business,” today’s “Big Six”–J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley–are the most rotten and corrupt institutions on the globe. They have sold America down the river by creating and destroying gigantic investment bubbles, feasting on massive bailouts paid for by taxpayers, and spending the last two generations shipping workers’ jobs to low-paying foreign labor markets. Then they turn around and use America and its passive population as the world’s policeman to protect their investments.

Just as bad are international institutions like the International Monetary Fund, the Bank of International Settlements, and the European Central Bank, as well as national central banks like the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Deutsche Bundesbank, etc. While Hitler allegedly killed millions, the world’s bankers make life or death decisions that affect billions. They do it through control of the money spigot, which gives them power over every business and industry in the world that utilizes any form of credit. And credit is as essential to most businesses as breathing is to a human being.

When the dust settles, will there still be communities of human survivors in America? That may depend on the Americans themselves and how successful they are at reclaiming their freedom. Whatever survivors there are may be spiritually-minded and will of necessity live close to nature. But the scale and appearance of any future civilization is an unknown. Europe’s future could be as tenuous. Maybe Russia, China, and selected locations in Latin America, Asia, or Africa will do better. We don’t yet know.

What we should know is that the time is up for humanity. We have had our chance to decide what we value, whether service to a false conception of a separate self or service to God and neighbor. Now we are likely to find out for certain what measure of truth we have imbibed and incorporated into our being during many lifetimes.

The testing has come, but it has been foreseen for a long time. The Master came two millennia ago and showed the way. Why do we think someone else is coming now to save us? We were given the tools and the time to learn how to use them. Now we have no more excuses.

Rather than promote war, conflict, and conquest, anyone with a genuine spiritual sense will do everything possible to encourage peace, justice, and harmony among peoples and nations. Nevertheless, the “end of the age” seems imminent. As the Shivapuri Baba said, as recorded in the book Long Pilgrimage by John Bennett (Dawn Horse Press, 1983), “We are at the end of a 6,000 year cycle.”

We should strive not to be confused or complacent. It is time now for individuals to make a decision on where they want to be for the challenges ahead, with whom they want to spend their time, and exactly how they intend to devote their energy and commitment. The best advice is to choose wisely and choose well but not to wait any longer.

Jesus said: “Ye know not the day or the hour.” So why do we wake up every morning still thinking we know what the day will bring? In fact we do not know. The processes we are looking at herein could take a day, a year, or a century. So what is to be done? Following are some suggestions:

Richard C. Cook is a writer on public policy issues.



Friday
May212010

As Oceans Get Warmer, Congress Is Facing Heat 

by David Perlman, Chronicle Science Editor

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/19/MNPS1DGRNN.DTL

On the same day that climate researchers reported strong new evidence that the temperatures of the world's oceans are on the rise, teams of America's leading scientists Wednesday called on Congress to face the urgent problem of global warming by raising the cost of greenhouse gas emissions to U.S. industry.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May202010

BP Withholds Oil Spill Facts — and Government Lets It

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/05/18/94415/bps-secrecy-keep-facts-on-gulf.html

by Marisa Taylor and Renee Schoof

WASHINGTON - BP, the company in charge of the rig that exploded last month in the Gulf of Mexico, hasn't publicly divulged the results of tests on the extent of workers' exposure to evaporating oil or from the burning of crude over the gulf, even though researchers say that data is crucial in determining whether the conditions are safe.

Moreover, the company isn't monitoring the extent of the spill and only reluctantly released videos of the spill site that could give scientists a clue to the amount of the oil in gulf.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May202010

Academy of Sciences defends climate-change research, conclusions

McClatchy Newspapers

Published Wednesday, May. 19, 2010

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/19/2762887/academy-of-sciences-defends-climate.html

WASHINGTON -- The National Academy of Sciences, the nation's most prestigious scientific body, issued a strong defense of the

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May202010

Scientists say Arctic sea ice melting toward record

The latest satellite data show ice coverage is equal to what it was in 2007, the lowest year on record, and is declining faster than it did that year.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May202010

Slick Operator: The BP I've known too well 

by Greg Palast for Truthout.org
May 5, 2010

I've seen this movie before. In 1989, I was a fraud investigator hired to dig into the cause of the Exxon Valdez disaster. Despite Exxon's name on that boat, I found the party most to blame for the destruction was ... British Petroleum. That's important to know, because the way BP caused devastation in Alaska is exactly the way BP is now sliming the entire Gulf Coast.

Deepwater Horizon in flames before sinking. Photo provided by D.Becnel

Tankers run aground, wells blow out, pipes burst. It shouldn't happen but it does. And when it does, the name of the game is containment. Both in Alaska, when the Exxon Valdez grounded, and in the Gulf over a week ago, when the Deepwater Horizon platform blew, it was British Petroleum that was charged with carrying out the Oil Spill Response Plans ("OSRP") which the company itself drafted and filed with the government.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
May192010

Coverup? Govt Denies Any Oil in Loop Current or Florida. Tar Balls Found In Florida Keys

By Rob Kall

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Coverup-Govt-Denies-Any-O-by-Rob-Kall-100518-4.html

Even late yesterday, multiple government agencies have held to the BP claim that the leak is only 5,000 barrels a day, though most scientists have challenged those numbers.

The spokespeople for NOAA, the Coastguard, Homeland Security, MMS are all saying that no oil has reached the Loop current, which connects to and feeds into the gulfstream which could take the oil gusher's output all the way the east coast, even to Europe. .

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
May192010

Ignoring Calls for Moratorium, Shell Seeks to Drill in Arctic Seas This Summer

by Tim Webb

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/05/18-8

Shell yesterday pushed ahead with plans to drill in the Arctic Sea [1] this summer, defying calls for a moratorium on offshore exploration in the pristine wilderness following the Gulf of Mexico disaster.

California's governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, this month scrapped plans to allow offshore drilling in the state for the first time in more than 40 years and environmentalists have called for a halt in the Arctic [2] after President Obama opened up the area to drilling [3]for the first time last month.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
May182010

Commentary: Stopping the Gulf oil spill with oatmeal and a very long straw

Carl Hiaasen | The Miami Herald

last updated: May 18, 2010 08:35:16 AM

An absolutely true news item: British Petroleum says it is considering a plan to plug the main leak on the sunken Deepwater Horizon oil rig by shooting it full of shredded car tires, old golf balls and knotted ropes.

British Petroleum announced today that it has fired its top engineer for safety design and replaced him with Jody McNamara, age 12, a sixth-grade honors student at the Dwight Eisenhower Middle School in Tulsa, Okla.

McNamara, who will earn about $350,000 a year in salary and stock options, was offered the BP job after a panel of industry experts selected his 250-word essay, "How To Stop Undersea Oil Leaks Really Quick," over thousands of other entries.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
May182010

The Anthropocene Debate: Marking Humanity’s Impact

by Elizabeth Kolbert

http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2274

The Holocene - or "wholly recent" epoch - is what geologists call the 11,000 years or so since the end of the last ice age. As epochs go, the Holocene is barely out of diapers; its immediate predecessor, the Pleistocene, lasted more than two million years, while many earlier epochs, like the Eocene, went on for more than 20 million years. Still, the Holocene may be done for. People have become such a driving force on the planet that many geologists argue a new epoch - informally dubbed the Anthropocene - has begun.

Click to read more ...

Monday
May172010

Congressional Climate Bills - Stealth Schemes to Raise Energy Prices and Enrich Wall Street 

By Stephen Lendman

Host of Progressive Radio News Hour Thursdays at 11 am l Weekends at 1 pm

On June 26, 2009, HR 2454: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACESA) passed, purportedly "To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition to a clean energy economy."

In fact, it lets energy polluters raise prices for huge windfall profits and gives Wall Street a bonanza through carbon trading derivatives speculation. Catherine Austin Fitts' Solari.com blog explained it last July in her article titled, "The Next Really Scary Bubble" is coming, saying:

Click to read more ...

Monday
May172010

BP Cited for Worst OSHA Safety Violations Among U.S. Refiners

WASHINGTON - May 17 - Two refineries owned by oil giant BP account for 97 percent of all flagrant violations found in the refining industry by government safety inspectors over the past three years, a Center for Public Integrity analysis [3] shows. Most of BP's citations were classified as "egregious willful" by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and reflect alleged violations of a rule designed to prevent catastrophic events at refineries.

Click to read more ...

Monday
May172010

Quest for Oil Leaves Trail of Damage Across the Globe

by Tom Knudson

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/05/16/94126/quest-for-oil-leaves-trail-of.html

Like many of her neighbors, Celina Harpe is angry about the oil pollution at her doorstep. No longer can she eat the silvery fish that dart along the shore near her home. Even the wind that hurries over the water reeks of oil waste.

Baloa Gbone stands at the site of an oil spill in Nigeria's Delta region. (Shashank Bengali / MCT)

"I get so mad," she said. "I feel very sad."

Harpe, 70, isn't a casualty of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. She lives in a remote corner of Alberta, Canada, where another oil field that's vital to the United States is damaging one of the world's most important ecosystems: Canada's northern forest.

Click to read more ...