;)
;)
;)
Gary Null, Ph.D., and Nancy Ashley, VMD - GARDASIL: CHILD ABUSE BY BIG PHARMA
January 12, 2012 By Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD
In 1987, I was asked to debate a group of 6 scientists about the very promising AIDS drug, AZT. Signs around NYU Medical School exhorted everyone to “Put Time on Your Side”, and the vast majority of activists, including ACT UP, were pushing the government to allocate all available funds to get this drug into as many people as possible who had been diagnosed with AIDS. I was the only one who was dissenting and there was a simple reason: I had spoken with John Lauritsen.Lauritsen, an investigative journalist who wrote for the New York Native in the 1980s and 1990s, knew that AZT was a fraud. Originally a chemotherapy drug that was rejected due to excessive toxicity, AZT was resurrected for use as an AIDS treatment and fast tracked by the FDA for approval in just six months. Lauritsen looked closely at the one single study used as a basis for this approval, and found: “the description of methodology was incomplete and incoherent. Not a single table was acceptable according to statistical standards – indeed, not a single table made sense. In particular, the first report, on “efficacy” was marred by contradictions, ill-logic, and special pleading.” Lauritsen discovered that this poor-quality study was unblinded early, allowing both doctors and patients to know whether AZT or the placebo was being taken, thus completely invalidating the study. Then the study itself was terminated early, ostensibly so that all participants would be able to take AZT, which appeared so effective at preventing death from AIDS. The real-life follow up, however, at no time repeated the stunning results of this mangled study. Instead, according to Lauritsen, “More than 96% of all “AIDS” deaths in the U.S. occurred after AZT was approved for marketing in 1987. Those deaths were not caused by a virus, but by AZT. “
Medicine For Sale: Tracing the Shadowy Money Trail that Exploits your Health (Part 1)
December 12, 2011 By Gary Null, PhD and Jeremy Stillman
Each day, millions of Americans visit a physician. Whether they go to the office of a primary care physician, consult with a specialist or seek medical assistance at an outpatient clinic or hospital emergency room, in all cases, there is an underlying assumption that the quality of care they are given must be the best in the world because we spend nearly twice as much as any other country in the world on individual healthcare. Also, we are led to believe by our physicians and nurses, the media and the many federal agencies that oversee the medical-industrial complex, including the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) that everything offered to patients is based upon scientifically proven therapies for safety and efficacy or science-based medicine.
At the same time, we are told that any approaches to health involving non-science-based medicine is to be rejected; these include homeopathy, ayurvedic medicine, acupuncture, acupressure, massage, aromatherapy, magnet therapy, chiropractic medicine and supplementation with vitamins. We are told that such modalities have no foundation in science and that they have an almost cult-like following. Our health authorities make it clear that patients pursuing these alternative therapies have never made any improvements, in any circumstances, simply because they aren’t dealing with science-based medicine. The medical establishment tells us that anyone who sees improvement in their health using a non-science-based therapy was either misdiagnosed in the first place or improved only because they were treated by some form of science-based medicine that they must have received before. Hence, all practitioners of alternative medicine must be at best delusional, and at worse, out-and-out frauds and quacks who should be disgraced and imprisoned.
This has been the existing medical paradigm for nearly a century. Confronted with this situation, we ask a few basic questions: Is science-based medicine safe and effective? If so, where is the proof? And if it is not safe and effective, where is the proof? We also ask are alternative therapies are safe and effective? If they are, where is the proof? If they are not, where is the proof? These are reasonable questions to ask.
Then comes the great disconnect: our country will spend $2.6 trillion on medical care this year yet virtually nothing is spent on prevention and there is no condemnation of diet contributing to disease. The only admonitions that we hear are “don’t smoke” and “drink in moderation.” Any evidence demonstrating that a disease may stem from processed foods and beverages, environmental chemicals, stress, or a lack of exercise is either not discussed or downplayed. As a result, the average American doesn’t pay a great deal of attention to what they feed themselves and their children; nor do they bother to devote much time in their daily lives to exercise or meditation.
Features | in Big Pharma, Features, Health, Health Care, Medicine | Email Article | Permalink iEat Green with Bhavani Jaroff has a Special Announcement!
December 12, 2011 
Hi Everyone,
All the Best,
Bhavani
Gary Null, PhD and Jeremy Stillman - Prescription for Disaster: The Dirty Dozen FDA-Approved Pharmaceutical Drugs
December 5, 2011 By Gary Null, PhD and Jeremy Stillman
The Food and Drug Administration is mandated with the responsibility to ensure that our foods and medications are safe and effective. Hence, when a physician, primary health care provider or pharmacist provides a consumer with these medications, there is a fundamental belief that these work and will do minimal harm. Then we meet reality. The FDA has not only allowed extraordinarily inefficient, extremely toxic drugs onto the market, but then has ran interference on behalf of pharmaceutical companies and other special interests to protect their profits instead of immediately withdrawing their drugs from the market.
The consequence of eating at a restaurant you don’t like is that you won’t go back again. The consequence of taking a toxic drug is injury or death. The FDA has a long history of allowing deadly drugs to be promoted and marketed. The FDA has not sought prosecution when prima facie evidence proves that the manufacturers and their scientists, boards of directors and marketers knew all along that these drugs did not work as claimed or had dangerous side effects that they withheld from the FDA . These companies have engaged in overtly criminal activities and instead of ending up in prison or bankrupt, rarely is anyone ever held accountable. Bonuses are given and the value of their corporate holdings goes up- it’s all part of the cost of doing business today.
This article is to show you clear and exact examples of lethal and harmful drugs that should never have been marketed – some of which are still available to consumers. They are drugs that an honest and diligent FDA would never have allowed to be released on the market. Cumulatively, tens of thousands of Americans have died and hundreds of thousands more have been injured. And in the few cases that do make it to court, what is the standard penalty meted out for such brazen criminality? Pay a fine. Smile. You got out of jail free.
Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/dexfenfluramine/phentermine)
Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS - FLU VACCINE: THE COVERUP – THE FRAUD
December 5, 2011 By Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS
The CDC is just beginning its annual Influenza Vaccination Week which runs from December 4th through the 10th.1 There will be a media onslaught as they try to persuade us that the end is near if we don’t get the flu vaccine. All of the regulatory bodies and the opinion leaders, the CDC, the FDA, the Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, the AMA, the American Academy of Pediatrics and all the health care providers would have us believe that flu is a serious illness that can only be prevented by annual vaccination of everyone from 6 months of age on up. They try to instill us with fear: flu is unpredictable, it can be severe, it can kill -- and there might not be enough vaccine for everyone! What if there is a pandemic? Should we be worried? Should we get the vaccine to protect our friends and loved ones? Maybe not. Let’s take a look at some of the facts the CDC would rather you didn’t know.
Is It Really Dangerous Not to Get the Flu Vaccine?
The CDC’s website used to state that 36,000 Americans die of flu each year, but this number was never accurate. First, the CDC inflated the numbers by lumping together deaths from flu and pneumonia as though they were all from flu when actually, the annual deaths from pneumonia unrelated to flu have always been far greater than those from flu. More significantly, this number was never based in actual deaths. It comes instead from a statistical model which only estimates mortality but doesn’t actually count the numbers of deaths.2 This year, however, the CDC’s website reflects the criticism they have received about this overstatement. In an impressive downward revision, the CDC now states that “over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu-associated deaths in the United States range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people.”3 Quite a difference! For 2007, the CDC’s own statistics show that the number of deaths actually caused by influenza was just 411, and the death rate was therefore only 0.1 out of 100,000 people.4
The Vaccine Does Not Prevent the Flu or Flu-Like Illness
Mitchell J. Rabin - A Better World Newsletter
December 5, 2011 DECEMBER 5, 2011
|
ABW on Progressive Radio Network
|
|||||||
Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS - DEADLY INJECTION: THE HIDDEN INGREDIENTS IN VACCINES
November 30, 2011 
DEADLY INJECTION: THE HIDDEN INGREDIENTS IN VACCINES
By Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS
- There are dozens of gold standard studies proving beyond a shadow of a doubt the safety and efficacy of every vaccine and every combination of vaccines.
- There is an independent group of scientists at the FDA and the CDC that examines the childhood vaccine schedule to make sure it is appropriate.
- There is no scientific proof that vaccines are dangerous.
- On rare occasions, when someone does have an adverse reaction, it in no way affects the safety and efficacy for anyone else.
- Virtually all major scourges -- polio, smallpox, and measles -- were eliminated by our vaccine program.
Well, I’m persuaded. But there is one little point – what if there is evidence that can prove that vaccines are neither safe nor effective for a given individual? For example, let’s examine the ingredients. Analyzing the data from the finest peer-reviewed studies, are the ingredients non-toxic, non-allergic, non-stressing to the body’s immune system?
Oops! It seems we have a problem, Scotty.
Features, Vaccines | in Andrew Wakefield, Features, Health, Medicine, Vaccines | Email Article | Permalink Mitchell Rabin - Socially-Conscious Stress Management
November 7, 2011 by Mitchell J. Rabin, host of A Better World (Mondays at 6pm ET on PRN)
There is so much turmoil in our nation and in the world today. I see that people are overwhelmed and significantly stressed in trying to understand and deal with the differing scales of difficulty and stress, and prioritize them in a way that allows for some kind of reasonably balanced life.There has always been varying levels of stress in the world on both the micro- and macro- scales, but I would venture to say that it may be occurring at several notches above the usual what has been historically known. Within relatively recent history, WWI, The Great Depression and WWII were no cakewalks, each was extremely difficult on physical, emotional and existential levels. It could even be considered rather remarkable, if not miraculous, that human beings entered and emerged from these dark clouds of our history. Certainly, we are entering another one and a question is how far can an individual or family stretch before illness, be it physical or mental, manifests. Managing stress inwardly, and participating in managing our lives, individual, family and societally, I’m suggesting, is a key to some sense of meaning, harmony and balance.
Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS - Gardasil: Does it Heal or Does it Kill?
November 2, 2011 The Gardasil vaccine against human papillomavirus has been much profiled in the news recently and the news isn’t good. Despite continued incidents of serious, life-altering adverse reactions, including paralysis and death, and despite questionable efficacy and safety studies that allowed this vaccine to come to market in the first place, the push to force the Gardasil vaccine on our children has been relentless and seems to be picking up speed. The following is a review of the more significant and far reaching stories that surfaced, mostly under the radar of the general public, during the past four weeks.
Gary Null, Jeremy Stillman and Nancy Ashley - Vaccine Conspiracy: The CDC Caught Lying Again
October 29, 2011 A bombshell revelation coming out of an investigation by the drug safety group Coalition for Mercury-free Drugs (CoMeD) has rocked the foundation of a belief widely held by mainstream medicine – the idea that vaccines do not cause autism. In a news release last Tuesday, CoMeD exposed a cover-up by authorities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and vaccine researchers who deliberately omitted critical data from a 2003 article on mercury and autism that was carried out in Denmark. The conclusion of the article denied any causal relationship between the mercury-laden vaccine ingredient Thimerosal and autism. However, documents obtained by CoMeD indicate that the authors of the article, with the full approval of the CDC, decided to leave out large quantities of data which, in fact, supported a strong link between Thimerosal and the incidence of autism.
Gary Null PhD and Nancy Ashley VMD, MS - All Vaccines Are Dangerous
October 24, 2011 In one of the most significant and far-reaching vaccine injury cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled in February 2011, that persons injured by vaccines are not allowed to sue the manufacturer for damages.1 Should we be worried by this decision? We in America believe in vaccines. We have an image of researchers and scientists working diligently to monitor the safety of vaccines in close cooperation with officials, communities, immunization registries, and health care professionals to ensure that Americans get only the finest, safest products. We could never imagine that a pharmaceutical company would use anything in a vaccine that they knew was harmful, or that the government would require us to inject a substance into our bodies that could mortgage our long-term health. Are we being too naïve? Of all the vaccines we and our children are expected to get, what is the truth about the potential for harm? In Part III of our original investigative report we will take an in-depth look at the risks involved in childhood and adult vaccines.
Gary Null PhD and Nancy Ashley VMD, MS - Arm Yourself Against the Flu – Don’t Get the Flu Shot!
October 24, 2011 It is fall and another flu season is upon us. The CDC’s big marketing claim about the flu vaccine emphasizes repeatedly that “36,000 Americans die of flu each year.” But is this true? A 2005 study from the British Medical Journal debunks this figure by revealing two things: first, the number is not based in counting actual deaths. It comes from a statistical model which only estimates mortality but doesn’t actually track it. Second, if anyone questions this large mortality, the CDC inflates the numbers by combining deaths from flu and pneumonia as though they were all flu deaths. Actually, the annual deaths from pneumonia unrelated to flu are far greater than those from flu.1
