Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Best Places to Live in the US:
How the States Rank in the Face of Climate Change

Plus: The 10 Greenest Cities
Download
| Maps and analysis for you and your family.


When the media says There's "No Valid Arguments Against ___"

Try these:

Hydrofracking
Nuclear / Indian Point
Gardasil
Vaccination
Genetically-Modified Food
AIDS | HIV

The articles and reports the mainstream media tries to silence.

Health

LISTEN LIVE!

Tell Governor Cuomo:
Don't Frack New York
SIgn up for the bus today!



PLAY IN POPUP!

Trouble? Choose from our alternate ways to listen:

   

You can also call in to hear our live stream at (832) 280-0066!

CONTACT US AT: 888-874-4888

Subscribe to Our Full Podcast Feed!

Fill out your e-mail address
to receive our weekly newsletter,
with exclusive updates,
giveaways, and event invitations!
E-mail address:
 
(We will never, ever share your info with 3rd parties.)

 NEW: Find us on Google+ !

« 10 WAYS MOTHER EARTH WILL STRIKE BACK IF WE DON'T STOP OUR WANTON DESTRUCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT | Main | STUDY: THE ENVIRONMENTAL COST OF DOING BUSINESS COULD ERASE A THIRD OF CORPORATIONS' PROFITS »
Friday
Apr302010

COAL-FIRED PLANTS DRINK 1.5 TRILLION GALLONS OF WATER ABD WE DRINK THE DIRTY BACKWASH

AlterNet / By Jeff Biggers

In many respects, some folks might use more water flicking on their lights, than chugging back a glass of that wondrous stuff.

Here's a sobering fact: Coal-fired power plants use approximately 1.5 trillion gallons of water a year in the US.

In many respects, some folks might use more water flicking on their lights, than chugging back a glass of that wondrous stuff.

Makes you wonder: Has the EPA ever tabulated the external costs of coal on our water resources?

And then, after that refreshing drink of desperately needed water, the 600-odd coal-fired plants (the EIA actually reports 1,445 coal-firedgenerators) typically throw up their chemically enhanced processed wastewater into our rivers and waterways, poisoning our own drinking water.

According to a recent analysis of EPA data, the NY Times concluded:

"Power plants are the nation's biggest producer of toxic waste, surpassing industries like plastic and paint manufacturing and chemical plants."

But the cleaner air has come at a cost. Each day since the equipment was switched on in June, the company has dumped tens of thousands of gallons of wastewater containing chemicals from the scrubbing process into the Monongahela River, which provides drinking water to 350,000 people and flows into Pittsburgh, 40 miles to the north.

"It's like they decided to spare us having to breathe in these poisons, but now we have to drink them instead," said Philip Coleman, who lives about 15 miles from the plant and has asked a state judge to toughen the facility's pollution regulations. "We can't escape."

Even as a growing number of coal-burning power plants around the nation have moved to reduce their air emissions, many of them are creating another problem: water pollution.

Not that the coal industry hasn't already fouled our headwaters and waterways through strip-mining and underground mining pollution. As the NY Times reported in their amazing "Toxic Waters" series, communities across the coalfields ofAppalachia do not have access to drinking water, due to the contamination of their watersheds and wells from coal slurry.

Mountaintop removal mining alone has destroyed over 2,000 miles of streams and waterways in Appalachia--given that strip-mining takes place in over 20 states, feel free to extrapolate the impact of this devastating mining process and legally permitted toxic discharges to watersheds and stream for thousands of communities across the nation.

(On the northern Arizona reservations, Peabody Energy pumped out an estimated one billion gallons of scarce water per year to operate its slurry operations at the Black Mesa strip mine--which was recently denied a life-of-mine permit.)

In the meantime, underground longwall mining--the reckless process of removing pillars from underground mines and allowing for massive subsidence--is plundering the water sources in the farm belt of Illinois, and across coal states like Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

Peruse these stats as you drink today:

2010-03-23-Picture5.png

According to the Union of Concerned Scientists:


A typical 500-megawatt coal-fired power plant draws about 2.2 billion gallons of water each year from nearby water bodies, such as lakes, rivers, or oceans, to create steam for turning its turbines. This is enough water to support a city of approximately 250,000 people.

And here's a graph of water violations from coal-fired plants in eastern and Midwestern states, based on the NY Times analysis of the EPA data:



PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>