Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Best Places to Live in the US:
How the States Rank in the Face of Climate Change

Plus: The 10 Greenest Cities
Download
| Maps and analysis for you and your family.


When the media says There's "No Valid Arguments Against ___"

Try these:

Hydrofracking
Nuclear / Indian Point
Gardasil
Vaccination
Genetically-Modified Food
AIDS | HIV

The articles and reports the mainstream media tries to silence.

Health

LISTEN LIVE!

Tell Governor Cuomo:
Don't Frack New York
SIgn up for the bus today!



PLAY IN POPUP!

Trouble? Choose from our alternate ways to listen:

   

You can also call in to hear our live stream at (832) 280-0066!

CONTACT US AT: 888-874-4888

Subscribe to Our Full Podcast Feed!

Fill out your e-mail address
to receive our weekly newsletter,
with exclusive updates,
giveaways, and event invitations!
E-mail address:
 
(We will never, ever share your info with 3rd parties.)

 NEW: Find us on Google+ !

« Karl Grossman - Eminent Domain and the Fight Against Nuclear Power | Main | Iraq water crisis could stir ethnic clash »
Friday
Feb102012

Dirty Biofuels: Leaked Data Shows Some Worse Than Fossil Fuels

According to leaked data from the European Commission obtained by EuroActiv, greenhouse gas emissions from some biofuels are higher than those from fossil fuels, when Indirect Land Usage Change (ILUC) is factored in.

EuroActiv reports:

ILUC happens when forests and wetlands are cleared to compensate for lands taken to grow biofuels elsewhere.

One recent report predicted that all of Malaysia’s tropical peatswamp forests would be destroyed by the end of the decade because of ILUC - with alarming consequences for greenhouse gas emissions - unless the expansion of palm oil production was halted.

To measure the climate impact of fuels, Brussels favours assigning default values based on a calculation of their full lifecycle emissions, hence the debate over ILUC factors and biofuels.

In its recent review of the Fuel Quality Directive, the EU proposed a default value of 107g CO2 equivalent per megajoule of fuel (CO2/mj) for oil from tar sands, as compared to 87.5g CO2/mj for crude oil, reflecting the greater environmental harm that its production causes.

Read More:

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/01/27-5 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>