Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Best Places to Live in the US:
How the States Rank in the Face of Climate Change

Plus: The 10 Greenest Cities
Download
| Maps and analysis for you and your family.


When the media says There's "No Valid Arguments Against ___"

Try these:

Hydrofracking
Nuclear / Indian Point
Gardasil
Vaccination
Genetically-Modified Food
AIDS | HIV

The articles and reports the mainstream media tries to silence.

Health

LISTEN LIVE!

Tell Governor Cuomo:
Don't Frack New York
SIgn up for the bus today!



PLAY IN POPUP!

Trouble? Choose from our alternate ways to listen:

   

You can also call in to hear our live stream at (832) 280-0066!

CONTACT US AT: 888-874-4888

Subscribe to Our Full Podcast Feed!

Fill out your e-mail address
to receive our weekly newsletter,
with exclusive updates,
giveaways, and event invitations!
E-mail address:
 
(We will never, ever share your info with 3rd parties.)

 NEW: Find us on Google+ !

« “Dr. Mercola” - 7 Foods for Better Sex | Main | “Scott Keys” – Rep. Trent Franks Calls For Impeaching Obama If He Doesn’t Reverse Course on the Defense of Marriage Act »
Friday
Mar042011

“Sahil Kapur” - Exclusive: Ohio anti-union bill may curtail benefits for unmarried live-in couples

By Sahil Kapur

Friday, March 4th, 2011 -- 12:52 pm

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/04/ohio-anti-union-bill-may-curtail-benefits-for-unmarried-live-in-couples/

Buried in a newly-passed Ohio bill stripping the collective bargaining rights of public employee unions is language that could curtail benefits for unmarried domestic couples who work for the state, regardless of sexual orientation.

The provision appears just below language forcefully restating the same-sex marriage ban in the state, an apparent legal formality for legislation amending existing Ohio code.

Section 3101.01 of the GOP-led bill states that a "marriage may only be entered into by one man and one woman... Any marriage between persons of the same sex is against the strong public policy of this state."

It adds: "The recognition or extension by the state of the specific statutory benefits of a legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is against the strong public policy of this state. Any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of this state, as defined in section 9.82 of the Revised Code, that extends the specific statutory benefits of legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is void ab initio."

Ed Mullen, the executive director of Equality Ohio, told Raw Story that the provision effectively strips protections on benefits for unmarried couples who are living together. He also argued it would disproportionately harm same-sex couples.

"Some state workers, such as Ohio state employees and state university employees, could receive domestic partner benefits if they are offered to all unmarried couples regardless of sexual orientation," Mullen said in an e-mail, noting as an example that some state universities offer domestic partner benefits already.

And while the language does not directly target same-sex couples, Mullen said it would have "a disproportionate impact on gay and lesbian couples" as they "cannot get married or obtain any other legal recognition of their relationships that would entitle us to equal health benefits."

"Plus, empirically gay and lesbian couples use domestic partner benefits at a greater rate than opposite sex couples," he said.

Ohio's Republican Gov. John Kasich, who championed the measure, did not respond to a request for comment.

The controversial legislation was approved Wednesday by the Republican-led Ohio Senate by a vote of 17 to 16. Six Republicans voted against it, according to the New York Times. It is expected to pass in the House and be signed into law next week.

It significantly weakens the ability of public employee unions to collectively bargain for benefits and pensions, an issue that has earned widespread national attention as a result of a weeks-long standoff in Wisconsin over a similar measure.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>